- The Adaptive Information Processing (AIP) model provides a framework for understanding EMDR by describing how unresolved experiences can remain linked with images, emotions and body sensations in maladaptive memory networks.
- In the model presented in the chart, these unresolved memories can continue activating or dysregulating the nervous system, while adaptive networks contain memories and experiences that can support regulation.
- EMDR processing aims to help previously “stuck” memories become processed and integrated with adaptive memory networks, reducing the activation associated with the original experience
What Is the AIP Model in EMDR Therapy?
Because as EMDR therapists we use the AIP model to guide our treatment approach, it helps to have a basic understanding of it and how it works. While the neurology behind EMDR processing can be very complicated, even a simple understanding of it can help guide the processing.
How the Target Event Gets Stored: Images, Emotions, and Body Sensations
I came up with this diagram while I was playing with the EMDR Standard Protocol and trying to find a way to sketch it out. Starting with the target event, that is, the life experience that will be processed, we see that the Image, Emotion, and Body Sensations are all attached to it, or come out of it. Those are the memories that are stuck or frozen – not metabolized – in the limbic brain that need
Where Negative Cognitions Come From
It is interesting to consider how negative cognition (NC) is developed and when it gets linked to memory. Because it is a thought that comes from the neocortex, and because the neocortex is offline during the activating event, means it must be determined by the unconscious mind, after the fact. In turn, it must be based on the Image, Emotion, and Body sensation, that is, the “Felt Sense” that is stimulated by the event.
The diagram shows that the memories from the event, that is, the Image, Emotion, and Body Sensations, are stored, or better yet “linked in” – in the limbic brain. That means they are below the level of thought (unconscious) and easily activated. In addition, they are stored in “neural networks” that, on the maladaptive side, are stuck or frozen in time, which is what makes them maladaptive.
Adaptive vs. Maladaptive Neural Networks
It makes sense that the maladaptive network and adaptive networks work the same way in that they link memories – images, emotions, and body sensations. One difference is that the maladaptive networks are dysregulating and the adaptive networks can be regulating – that is, used to calm and settle the NS.
What Happens When EMDR Processing Works
So, the chart shows that the target memory is located in the maladaptive neural network, and then with EMDR processing the memories are resolved, metabolized, or digested, that is, no longer stuck or frozen, linked to time and space and in this way are linked into the adaptive neural networks.
Why This Matters: The Clinical Takeaway
A final note is that I developed this chart to show to clients as a way to explain how EMDR works. Some like it and understand it and some don’t care but in any case, it helps to explain what we’re doing and why we’re doing it.
- The what: Resolving and integrating stuck and frozen memories in the limbic brain left over from earlier life experiences.
- The why: To get relief from the NS activation that those unresolved memories do which are the etiology of symptoms that disrupt current living.
FAQs
The Adaptive Information Processing model is the framework used in EMDR to conceptualize how experiences are stored and how unresolved memories may contribute to present symptoms. In the article’s chart, maladaptively stored memories include interconnected images, emotions and body sensations.
The article describes maladaptive networks as containing memories that remain “stuck or frozen in time.” Because these memories have not been fully processed, they can be easily activated and contribute to nervous-system dysregulation.
Adaptive networks contain memories, images, emotions and body sensations that have been processed and integrated. The article contrasts them with maladaptive networks by explaining that adaptive networks can have a regulating rather than dysregulating effect.